Twitter legacy verified checkmarks now indistinguishable from Twitter Blue subscribers – and people aren’t happy
Experts believe the food situation in North Korea is the worst it has been under Kim Jong Un’s 11-year rule.
Since it is now impossible to determine who paid for their blue checkmark on Twitter, many users are enraged and perplexed.
Twitter announced last month that it would no longer offer its legacy verified checkmarks and would instead charge users for the coveted blue tick.
The company owned by Elon Musk advised users to subscribe to Twitter Blue, which costs $8 (£6.51) per month for individual web users, if they wanted to keep their checkmark.
Musk tweeted in February: Twitter’s heritage Blue Checked is sadly profoundly defiled, so will dusk in a couple of months.”
The change was because of produce results on 1 April, however heritage confirmed clients have seen their marks are as yet unblemished.
Later, it was discovered that Twitter had altered the description of legacy verified accounts, despite speculation that Musk was engaging in an April Fools’ prank.
“This account is verified because it’s subscribed to Twitter Blue or is a legacy verified account” now appears in the description when a user clicks on a blue checkmark, putting legacy verified accounts in the same category as Twitter Blue subscribers.
Later, it was discovered that Twitter had altered the description of legacy verified accounts, despite speculation that Musk was engaging in an April Fools’ prank.
Previously, it read: ” This is a verified account from the past. It might or might not be noteworthy.
Therefore, it is now impossible to distinguish between those who paid for a blue checkmark and those who were verified prior to the legacy verified program’s implementation.
Musk has taken the liberty to remove the blue checkmark from one particular news organization, despite the fact that many of Twitter’s high-profile users are anticipating the loss of the checkmarks that helped verify and differentiate them from imposters on the social media platform.
The New York Times, which is one of Musk’s most detested news publications, has had its verification tick removed from its main account.
The newspaper made the claim in a story on Thursday that it would not pay Twitter for institutional account verification.
Before making disparaging remarks about the newspaper, the CEO of Twitter sent out a tweet early on Sunday stating that the Times’ checkmark would be removed.
On Sunday, numerous Times reporters and other accounts, including its business news and opinion pages, continued to have either blue or gold check marks.
In a statement released on Sunday, the Times stated, “We are not planning to pay the monthly fee for check mark status for our institutional Twitter accounts.”
“We additionally won’t repay correspondents for Twitter Blue for individual records, besides in uncommon occurrences where this status would be fundamental for the purpose of detailing.”
In the mean time, the Related Press, which has additionally said it won’t pay for the marks of approval, actually had them on its records at early afternoon on Sunday.
